Re: thanks Re: AMD or Intel: performance, price and ethics
- From: Jochen Schulz <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:51:10 +0200
Augustin:
On Saturday 20 September 2008 21:57:04 Jochen Schulz wrote:-- snip
From my two minute research, it appears Blender can use multiple
threads as well, so it's better to use, say, 4*2.6GHz instead of
2*3GHz.
The multi-thread capabilities of blender and (partially) ffmpeg is a
good news.
Don't rely too much on my comments on Blender as I have never used it
and I don't know which operations can be parallelized.
J.
--
As a child I pulled the legs from a spider.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- AMD or Intel: performance, price and ethics
- From: Augustin
- Re: AMD or Intel: performance, price and ethics
- From: Jochen Schulz
- thanks Re: AMD or Intel: performance, price and ethics
- From: Augustin
- AMD or Intel: performance, price and ethics
- Prev by Date: Re: rhythmbox
- Next by Date: Re: Random key
- Previous by thread: thanks Re: AMD or Intel: performance, price and ethics
- Next by thread: multi-threading: blender and ffmpeg - Re: thanks Re: AMD or Intel: performance, price and ethics
- Index(es):