Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- From: Alex Samad <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:11:04 +1100
Hi
You should try and keep this on list
Alex
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:17:42PM -0700, Robert L. Harris wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[snip]
I've updated my rules to this:
# # allow ftpd
HARVARD="10.1.1.32"
/sbin/modprobe nf_conntrack_ftp
# General
iptables -I INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 21 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 21 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 21 -j DNAT --to
10.1.1.32:21
I think I confused myself though, do I need the other rules I had for
port 20 or will the first INPUT rule
above cover that?
have a look here http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html (quick google on
ftp & ports).
It shows you how the ports are used for ftp.
The ftp contrack module that you where loading previous should handle
the "related" ports and allow them through, what I am not sure about is
weather it will handle the dnat'ing of those port. But then again you
could specify passive ftp only
here is another link
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/iptables-open-ftp-port-21/ (again google).
My strength is in itables not ftp (which is the reason for googling :) )
Also anything to do with iptables and firewalls you should probably read
a tutorial on iptables
Thank you for your help, I've not done anything this complex with
iptables before.
Robert
:wq!
====================================================================
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS With Dreams To Be A King,
ALONE. I speak for First One Should Be A Man
no-one else. - Manowar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFJOZp28+1vMONE2jsRAgqcAJoD1OSBDcvPq2K7GL6Ym4xHBDRaNQCgo8WJ
ExmTlAt0/odRCTgtkimlF/E=
=TiTI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Obviously, I pray every day there's less casualty."
- George W. Bush
04/11/2004
Fort Hood, TX
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- From: Robert L. Harris
- Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- References:
- iptables, ftp and dnat?
- From: Robert L. Harris
- Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- From: Alex Samad
- Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- From: Robert L. Harris
- Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- From: Alex Samad
- iptables, ftp and dnat?
- Prev by Date: Re: unbootable system after fresh 4.0r5 installation
- Next by Date: Re: unbootable system after fresh 4.0r5 installation
- Previous by thread: Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- Next by thread: Re: iptables, ftp and dnat?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|