Re: No soft-links for scp?



On 2009-02-27_08:50:25, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Hey,
Ah, in that case then the `sshfs mount && cp -sR` idea is probably going
to work best.

Exactly what I wound up doing, and it works great. The read / write
speed on the files is faster than with ssh through konqueror as well.

??If you don't want to get sshfs running then you could
also try generating the links on the server side then using scp/rsync to
get them. ??Something like:
me@server $ cd /tmp/links && cp -sR /path/to/dir ./ && rsync -a
/tmp/links/ me@laptop:~/links/`hostname`


I thought about doing that when I was reading the rsync manpage and I
saw that the -l option preserves symlinks. I did not test it, though.

sshfs is not at all difficult to get running. I got it working almost
trivially. First I had to learn how to use ssh. Then sshfs got working
before I ever confronted scp. sshfs is the way to go, unless the goal
has not been fully explained.


--
Paul E Condon
pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Public key SSH with Midnight Commander
    ... laptop and my remote host--no password fallback, ... I want to keep my SSH access as secure as possible by using only public ... Does sshfs support this? ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Q abt ssh, sshfs, and Stale NFS file handle
    ... and use ssh and sshfs to control operations on the others. ... I do not get this message when I view the same directory using sshfs. ... Restarting the nfs-common on the controlling host does not fix the ... Can I suggest mount nfs with udp instead of tcp, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • [OT] Re: SSH versus SSHFS
    ... On 04/26/07 11:55, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: ... better: SSH or SSHFS? ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: SSH versus SSHFS
    ... In my experience, if you are working with an editor it is probably better to use SSHFS, since the editing is done locally and the only time you have to worry about connection speed is when saving. ... If you are doing lots of filesystem work, I'd say SSH would be better, because the work is happening on the remote site and the only thing that needs to cross the line is the command line and responses. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: What ports need to be forwarded for NFS to work?
    ... using NFS directly over the Internet is not a good ... You might want to look at sshfs - or alternatively, ... securely over ssh or using a vpn. ... Even easier is to use the Nautilus file manager to access your files over ...
    (Ubuntu)