Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.



On Tue, 5 May 2009 00:31:32 -0600
Dave Thayer <debian0912423.dmthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Nuno Magalhדes wrote:
Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
reporting erroneous values?

I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results:

DVI:
# xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1280x1024 60.0*
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 60.0
1024x768 60.0
800x600 60.0 56.0
640x480 60.0

RGB:
# xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600
default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm
800x600 60.0* 56.0
640x480 60.0
400x300 60.0 56.0
320x240 60.0


These look like the basic VESA resolutions. I wonder if you could
force any additional resolutions by adding custom modelines to your
xorg.conf file.

dt


Any chance that it's a wide screen that has an option in the menu to either
automatically or manually adjust to a standard 3:4 resolution?

I've got a samsung syncmaster and on this particular monitor at least if I set
menu->setup->image size
to auto instead of wide (so that it gives a non-stretched screen for 3:4
resolutions) the edid comes out wrong and X doesn't recognize the high
resolutions. I don't recall what is the default behavior with this monitor
though.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx