Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:35:38 +0200
thveillon.debian wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
But unless you have a specific need to use stick to 32bit kernelWhy?
(driver, old application [in]compatibility), it is wise to move to
64bits.
I know that 64bit is the future. I have the feeling, however, that many
applications are still better supported on 32bit than on 64bit. This
applies especially for multimedia, web pages and viewing certain
restricted pdfs, but I have often regretted the decision to move one of
my workstations to 64bit, just because it adds more hassle than it gains
in performance.
Of course this is just my humble opinion. It may work for others.
So, again: What is the advantage of running 64bit that warrants the
extra hassle?
Cheers,
Johannes
Hi,
I have all the systems I use/admin in 64bits (amd64), it's mainly Debian
and Ubuntu, I don't feel any "hassle" anymore. It used to be a problem
for a few web pluggins and a few semi-deprecated programs, but not
anymore. Most systems are multimedia workstations, everything works very
well, including flash (native 64bits), Java (native 64bits), all
possible codecs (w64codecs and more), Mplayer, Xine, Blender...
I'm glad it works for you. I maintain that there are some sites and some
plugins that won't work correctly on amd64, while they work fine on x86.
Last time I tried virtualbox, would not start that proprietary OS on
amd64, either.
Regarding performances, it's sometimes just the same, often much faster,
never slower, so no reason to look back to i386 for me. There's many
comparison floating around, especially on www.phoronix.com, you can have
a look at this Ubuntu vs Fedora roundup
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_810_vs_fedora_10&num=4
Are you sure, that the x86 tests were carried out with the amd64-kernel
for x86? I am sure that 686-kernels will be outperformed by
amd64-kernels. My golden compromise between performance and usability is
a amd64 kernel with 32-bit userland.
If it's really the amd64-kernel on x86 that's outperformed, I'd start to
reconsider...
I imagine the performance gain should be even more sensible with some
databases or intensive scientific number-crushing apps.
After the recent change of German copyright (Urheberrecht), libraries
started to send copy-protected pdf's that require a closed source
DRM-plugin, which is only available for i386. So, what you gain in speed
by improved number-crunching, might be lost by not being able to study
the scientific literature :-(
[Of course, I would prefer to read the literature without the need of
non-free software! ]
Cheers,
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: Peter Hillier-Brook
- [going OT] Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: thveillon.debian
- Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- References:
- 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: Rod James Bio
- Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: 明覺
- Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: Frank Lin PIAT
- Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: Johannes Wiedersich
- Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- From: thveillon.debian
- 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- Prev by Date: Re: best ext3 reader/writer software?
- Next by Date: Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- Previous by thread: Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- Next by thread: [going OT] Re: 64Bit installation on a 500 GB Sata DRIVE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|