Re: ext4 - 52.2% non-contiguous
- From: Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:58:01 +0900
Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx> writes:
Actually shouldn't ext4 do _better_ (than ext3 etc) in such a case,
since it does allocate-on-write, allowing it to allocate contiguous
storage despite the user writes being small?
btw, I meant allocate-on-write-to-the-disk, aka delayed allocation...
-Miles
--
Quotation, n. The act of repeating erroneously the words of another. The words
erroneously repeated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- ext4 - 52.2% non-contiguous
- From: Daryl Styrk
- Re: ext4 - 52.2% non-contiguous
- From: Todd A. Jacobs
- Re: ext4 - 52.2% non-contiguous
- From: Miles Bader
- ext4 - 52.2% non-contiguous
- Prev by Date: E7400 - i386 and AMD64
- Next by Date: Re: E7400 - i386 and AMD64
- Previous by thread: Re: ext4 - 52.2% non-contiguous
- Next by thread: Re: ext4 - 52.2% non-contiguous
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
