Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- From: lee <lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:57:39 -0600
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:44:30PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
You can still decide if you want a partitionable or non-partitionable
RAID, thus not all RAIDs are partitionable since kernel
2.6.29. Unfortunately, the man page doesn't seem to say what the
default is for the partitionability of the RAID.
mdadm has, uh, conservative maintenance. mdp is no longer needed.
"non-partitionable" arrays will be partitionable with newer kernels.
Well, I gave the RAID a name, but that name got lost ... and it still
has p designation, with kernel 2.6.30.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- From: martin f krafft
- Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- References:
- Debian+LVM+RAID
- From: Vilasith Phonepadith
- Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- From: lee
- Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- From: martin f krafft
- Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- From: lee
- Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- From: martin f krafft
- Debian+LVM+RAID
- Prev by Date: Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- Next by Date: Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?
- Previous by thread: Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- Next by thread: Re: Debian+LVM+RAID
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|