Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:59 +0200
On 2009-08-12 19:15 +0200, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Well I was primarily wanting to stay with stable as this is an older laptop
and other than wanting an uptodate browser *always* I'd prefer to use
backports. Wonder why either backports or volatile don't carry the latest
versions of Iceweasel|Firefox. I thought that was the purpose of those 2
sources.
Somebody has to provide them first. As a general rule, backports are
only made for packages that are in testing, and Iceweasel 3.5 has not
even hit unstable yet.
Given that the maintainers of Mozilla packages in Debian are totally
overworked and understaffed, I don't think that backports will be made
any time soon.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- From: S. Fishpaste
- Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- References:
- Iceweasel 3.5
- From: S. Fishpaste
- Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- From: Charlie Kroeger
- Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- From: S. Fishpaste
- Iceweasel 3.5
- Prev by Date: Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- Next by Date: Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- Previous by thread: Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- Next by thread: Re: Iceweasel 3.5
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
