Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- From: Kelly Clowers <kelly.clowers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:18:04 -0700
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:22, JoeHill <joehill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, get an NVidia card and your troubles will be over forever. I have never
once been unable to get an NVidia card working, and I've been using them with
Linux for about 8 years.
That's fine, I guess, but personally I will never buy Nvidia until they
release open drivers and/or docs. To paraphrase RMS, "Don't buy
from Nvidia, enemy of your Freedom"
In any case, the drivers for Radeon are about as good, quality-wise,
as Nvidia drivers nowadays. Of course there can still be individual
problems with either one.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:03, thveillon.debian
<thveillon.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ubuntu tends to make the use of proprietary drivers "transparent" to
users, so maybe you where using "fglrx" there and not in Debian ?
The Radeon drivers are easier to configure than the fglrx drivers,
and fglrx is only available in Ubuntu if you install restricted drivers.
Dominik, do any errors show up in /var/log/Xorg.0.log?
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- From: John Hasler
- Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- References:
- Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- From: Dominik Smatana
- Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- From: Brent Clark
- Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- From: Dominik Smatana
- Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- From: JoeHill
- Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- Prev by Date: Fw: EJABBERD INTEGRADO CON LDAP
- Next by Date: Re: EJABBERD INTEGRADO CON LDAP
- Previous by thread: Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- Next by thread: Re: Debian vs. ATI Radeon x1650
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|