Re: acpitool vs acpi-support
- From: Klistvud <quotations@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:36:12 +0100
Dne, 15. 11. 2009 06:47:14 je T o n g napisal(a):
I can only say that I have acpi-support installed on my laptop, as
opposed to acpitool. I suppose it got installed automatically by the
"laptop" task, but can't positively confirm that. IMHO certain ACPI
packages would be more suited for certain hardware than others, and
vice versa?
I'd also say it's up to your individual usage. I personally find Gnome
sensors-applet extremely useful, whereas, say, cpufrequtils, though
being useful, may be easily replaced by just echoing the right values
to the right locations in the /proc or /sys subtrees (or reading values
therefrom).
--
Regards,
Klistvud
Certifiable Loonix User #481801
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com#[[Laptops In Heat]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- acpitool vs acpi-support
- From: T o n g
- acpitool vs acpi-support
- Prev by Date: Re: Inquiry:How to enable Telnet & SSH on my Debian 3.1 server?
- Next by Date: Dmesg gives "ata1.00 exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x80002 action 0x6 frozen"
- Previous by thread: acpitool vs acpi-support
- Next by thread: Re: acpitool vs acpi-support
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
