Re: Back to Debian after 10 years
- From: didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:33:17 +0100
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:28:08 +0000,
Vasco Costa <vasco.costa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote :
[...]
By the way, in case I want to go back to a rolling release scheme, how
does Debian testing/unstable behave in this regard for an experienced
power user? I know all the nuts and bolts of Archlinux, including
using the testing repo and ABS massively, so a comparison by someone
which has used both currently would be much appreciated.
Hi,
While I have been using Debian Stable for years, I have tested
numerous linux distros ands *BSD and last year I switched to Archlinux
for several months. Eventually I came back to Debian Stable because
it does not need to be continuously updated, being not a rolling
release distribution. That is the sole reason.
To *me*, Debian is Unstable is not a rolling release ditribution: it
is a continuously modified test distribution and is nowhere near
Archlinux in terms of stability.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Back to Debian after 10 years
- From: Vasco Costa
- Re: Back to Debian after 10 years
- References:
- Back to Debian after 10 years
- From: Vasco Costa
- Re: Back to Debian after 10 years
- From: Vasco Costa
- Back to Debian after 10 years
- Prev by Date: Re: Back to Debian after 10 years
- Next by Date: Archos 3 vision + debian 2.6.30-2-686 +usbmount: unsuccessful
- Previous by thread: Re: Back to Debian after 10 years
- Next by thread: Re: Back to Debian after 10 years
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
