gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:19:35 -0500
On 2010-03-17 10:40, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Installing Gnash screws up Flash.
That is the core of the problem that needs to be fixed.
There's no reason the two shouldn't be able to coexist peacefully so
that each user on the machine can choose which flash player she wants
to use.
The rub is that Debian doesn't officially know that Flash exists. Even if it did, too many DDs are morally opposed to closed-source to want to Depend on it.
--
Obsession with "preserving cultural heritage" is a racist impediment
to moral, physical and intellectual progress.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4BA14767.4080102@xxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Stephen Powell
- Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Celejar
- Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: enabling tap and circular scroll on touchpad and modern debian/X
- Next by Date: Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- Next by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
