Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Celejar <celejar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:26:48 -0400
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:03:39 -0400
Stefan Monnier <monnier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
I'm not at all convinced the problem is packaging (there doesn't seem to
be any conflict there). Last time I had a system with both Gnash and
adobe's flash, the problem was that Firefox just seemed to insist on
using Gnash even when I instructed it to disable the Gnash plugin.
So, all that's required is for someone to figure out how Firefox can be
convinced to use one over the other and then make sure this is well
documented.
At worst it may require some changes to Firefox.
A bug report against IW?
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100317232648.782a998d.celejar@xxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- References:
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- From: Stefan Monnier
- gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Celejar
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- Prev by Date: Re: (OT) gnash vs. flash
- Next by Date: Re: Change In Restarting Services
- Previous by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Next by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
