Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:36:11 -0400
I'm not at all convinced the problem is packaging (there doesn't seem to
be any conflict there). Last time I had a system with both Gnash and
adobe's flash, the problem was that Firefox just seemed to insist on
using Gnash even when I instructed it to disable the Gnash plugin.
So, all that's required is for someone to figure out how Firefox can be
convinced to use one over the other and then make sure this is well
documented.
At worst it may require some changes to Firefox.
A bug report against IW?
What's "IW"?
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jwv8w9p4p7j.fsf-monnier+gmane.linux.debian.user@xxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stephen Powell
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- References:
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- From: Stefan Monnier
- gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Celejar
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Celejar
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- Prev by Date: Re: (OT) gnash vs. flash
- Next by Date: why does resolv.conf change?
- Previous by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Next by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
