Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:42:37 -0500
Dotan writes:
How about Puddlerodent? Would that be an appropriate form of mockery
of the situation? I mock both Debian (zealotry)
What "zealotry"?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fx3tn8w2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- References:
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- From: Stefan Monnier
- gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: gnash vs. flash (was Re: Why does installing gnome ...)
- From: Celejar
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Celejar
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to obtain UUID of drives (squeeze udev lacks vol_id)
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox
- Next by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|