Re: [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:54:00 -0500
Stephen Powell writes:
This is off topic, but why exactly did Debian have to rebrand Firefox
as iceweasel for their distribution?
Mozilla owns the "FIREFOX" trademark and threatens to sue anyone who
applies that label to patched versions. Debian backports security
patches (Mozilla refuses to do so).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87bpehn8d3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox
- References:
- [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox (was gnash vs. flash)
- From: Stephen Powell
- [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox (was gnash vs. flash)
- Prev by Date: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Next by Date: Booting from newly installed Kernel package?
- Previous by thread: [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox (was gnash vs. flash)
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] iceweasel vs. Firefox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|