Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:22:37 -0500
Dotan writes:
Is Debian not openly resisting the legal yet anti-civilian wrath of
those who would rule us, our software, and our rights to use our
hardware as we see fit?
Who is "Debian"? Some developers are just trying to create the best
possible operating system. Not everyone is out to change the world.
Unlike the FSF we do not demand that everyone be politically correct and
subscribe to dogma. We just ask that they accept the Social Contract
and adhere to the DFSG.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87tys9lbsy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- References:
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Stefan Monnier
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: John Hasler
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: John Hasler
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Frank McCormick
- Re: gnash vs. flash
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Why does installing gnome packages versioned 2.28+6 insist on installing gnash?
- Prev by Date: sophie adenet
- Next by Date: Iceweasel (from backports) keeps busy cursor at startup
- Previous by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Next by thread: Re: gnash vs. flash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
