Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- From: Stephen Powell <zlinuxman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:00:34 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:01:41 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
Couldn't say why they switched, but I find pages in Epiphany 2.29 in
Squeeze look vivid compared with the Gecko version.
I have switched back and forth between epiphany and iceweasel several
times, on the same computer and monitor, and I have not noticed any
difference in image quality between iceweasel, which is based on
gecko (xulrunner-1.9.1) and epiphany-browser, which is based on webkit
(libwebkit-1.0-2).
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1137023388.158078.1271728834477.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- From: Andrew Malcolmson
- Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- References:
- Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- From: Andrew Malcolmson
- Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- Prev by Date: Re: USB device attached via RS232 adaptor
- Next by Date: Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- Previous by thread: Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- Next by thread: Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|