Re: Re: The future of "nv" driver
- From: "James P. Wallen" <jpwallen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:55:52 -0400
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 4/24/2010 7:31 AM, John Hasler wrote:Mark Allums writes:Ah, a matter of taste, then. (Debian tastes bad with Nvidia loaded,
apparently.)
No. A matter of support.
Okay. But perhaps a less loaded word than "taint" could be chosen.
MAA
I always had the feeling that "tainted" was not so much meant to be derogatory as to indicate that the use of proprietary blobs introduce unknown elements into the kernel. If I brought a glass of purple water down to the local water purification plant and complained that their water tasted like grapes, they'd tell me it wasn't their problem that I'd added grape kool-aid to it. Same thing. Well, except for that fact that it's a crappy analogy.
;)
Hmmm. Maybe Debian could set up "activation servers" that could determine whether or not we are using "genuine Debian".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4BD43BD8.3050301@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: The future of "nv" driver
- From: Tzafrir Cohen
- Re: The future of "nv" driver
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: Re: The future of "nv" driver
- From: Nuno Magalhães
- Re: Re: The future of "nv" driver
- References:
- Re: The future of "nv" driver
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: The future of "nv" driver
- Prev by Date: Re: Icedove/Thunderbird 3.0 (was Re: The future of "nv" ...)
- Next by Date: Re: Re: The future of "nv" driver
- Previous by thread: Re: The future of "nv" driver
- Next by thread: Re: Re: The future of "nv" driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|