Re: building 2.6.35
- From: Stephen Powell <zlinuxman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:24:55 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:53:41 -0400 (EDT), Manoj Srivastava wrote:
With the new versions of kernel-package in Squeeze, running
make-kpkg clean should almost never be required (if the upstream
Makefiles are not borked, as they rarely are). The new make-kpkg
starts by removing and re-creating ./debian almost always, so the
explicit clean is redundant.
That would imply that things like --append-to-version and --revision
must be specified on every invocation, correct? One cannot, for example,
specify --append-to-version and --revision with the kernel_image
target and then leave them off with a subsequent invocation for the
modules_image target.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1972237850.112409.1281903895526.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: building 2.6.35
- From: Manoj Srivastava
- Re: building 2.6.35
- References:
- Re: building 2.6.35
- From: Manoj Srivastava
- Re: building 2.6.35
- Prev by Date: Re: Transmitting a webcam's flux to the Internet: how?
- Next by Date: DHClient Exit Scripts
- Previous by thread: Re: building 2.6.35
- Next by thread: Re: building 2.6.35
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
