Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- From: Camaleón <noelamac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:40:06 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Lu, 01 nov 10, 11:26:40, Camaleón wrote:
It is specified in Debian mailing list "code of conduct":
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#codeofconduct
***
Avoid sending large attachments.
***
Without any mention of what "large" means :(
More than ~25 KiB can be annoying for users with dial-up lines or GPRS.
I wonder, what do others think?
I personally prefer long logs and snapshot images are linked unless
otherwise specified (i.e., if the user does not have Internet access,
embedded those inside the e-mail is right).
I don't know why, but I also consider images inappropriate, but now I
see that a full screenshot of my desktop (1680x1050) is "only" about 3
times bigger than the *uncompressed* dmesg.
Is not only "size", but readability. An imagen of 1680x1050 it looks
cropped inside my Pan newsreader. I would have to scroll down
horizontally to get a full view.
External logs provide a better reading and understanding as MUA tends
to auto "wrap" lines and it becomes difficult to read them.
command > file.txt
and then attaching should not be a problem as word wrapping in viewers
can usually be toggled ;)
Yes, what I meant is that many e-mail clients do not allow forcing a non-
break line and they wrap the bunch of logs into several lines what is
hard to interpret.
Sample of non-break line:
***
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and...
***
Sample of wrapped lines:
***
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting
industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever
since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and...
***
I can choose when using one or other with Pan (and Mutt), but not all MUA
are capable of doing so.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.11.01.11.56.53@xxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- From: Andrei Popescu
- Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- From: Camaleón
- Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- From: Andrei Popescu
- Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- Prev by Date: Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- Next by Date: Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- Previous by thread: Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- Next by thread: Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|