Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:44:22 -0600
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:18 PM, <briand@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
Someone posted (to this list) a simple command line for sleeping the
system.
...
acpitool -S => suspend to disk (hibernate) => Puts machine into S4.
acpitool -s => suspend to ram (sleep) => Puts machine into S3.
man acpitool
Putting the machine into S3 is problematic for several HW. In several
cases HW goes to S3 OK, but it has trouble coming back. That wouldn't
be much of a problem unless the HW is your video card, :-)
There are multiple ways to do the same thing, there are the pm-* tools
as well, and several other ones. I just prefer using acpitool, which
I have for years...
--
Javier.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinbytwar_FUUb_DLrF0qzQk8HG9HPj0n1bsD2dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: Freeman
- Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: briand
- Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: briand
- Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- References:
- sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: briand
- sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- Prev by Date: Re: Debian 5 installation
- Next by Date: Re: Debian 5 installation
- Previous by thread: Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- Next by thread: Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
