Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: <briand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:49:54 -0800
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:44:22 -0600
Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:18 PM, <briand@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
Someone posted (to this list) a simple command line for sleeping the
system.
...
acpitool -S => suspend to disk (hibernate) => Puts machine into
S4. acpitool -s => suspend to ram (sleep) => Puts machine
into S3.
man acpitool
it is, appropriately, in the acpitool package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110103094954.08bca172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: Hugo Vanwoerkom
- Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- References:
- sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: briand
- Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- From: Javier Vasquez
- sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- Prev by Date: Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- Next by Date: Re: squeeze audio cd and automount
- Previous by thread: Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- Next by thread: Re: sleeping the system vs hibernate or suspend
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
