Re: Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:57:34 -0400
Nate Bargmann wrote:
Had this included Fedora it would be very difficult to pass this off asgrml and gentoo home pages as well!
joke. Still, the idea of the various community distributions working in
closer harmony is good for our community. Checking the Debian, Arch,
and OpenSUSE homepages just now and the fact that the same Canterbury
Distribution page is on each, shows that this is an unprecedented level
of visible cooperation between the projects. I think that there will
now be a desire for more visible cooperation between the projects where
it is feasable.
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In<fnord> practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4D95CBBE.1000107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- From: Jerome BENOIT
- Re: Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- From: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
- Re: Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- From: Nate Bargmann
- Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- Prev by Date: Re: Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- Next by Date: Re: Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- Previous by thread: Re: Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- Next by thread: Re: Debian was hacked: The Canterbury Distribution
- Index(es):