Re: [OT] Mice (was: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse)
- From: Darac Marjal <mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:06:16 +0100
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:40:14PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
[cut]
I still see some disadvantages for laser or BlueTrack based mice:
1/ They do not work on crystal or clear surfaces
2/ I find batteries (even rechargable) a PITA :-)
3/ There are also some security concerns in using wireless for input
devices but nowadays I think the data flow between sender and receiver
units can be encrypted
There's no reason that an optical mouse has to be wireless. Similarly,
there's no reason that a wireless mouse has to be optical. I've used
wired (USB) optical mice for ages now and love the fact they they never
get sticky. I find that ball mice gum up with detritus and you need to
give them a good shove to get the ball to move. Optical mice always
respond immediately.
As for not working on clear surfaces, consider yourself lucky. Sun
optical mice (e.g. http://www.memoryxsun.com/3701398.html) require a
specific mousepad with a calibrated grid printed on them. The mouse can
only report its movement relative to this grid (rather than relative to
an arbitrary surface as with modern mice).
--
Paul Saunders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Mice
- From: Scott Ferguson
- Re: [OT] Mice (was: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse)
- From: Camaleón
- Re: [OT] Mice
- References:
- PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse
- From: Ralf Mardorf
- Re: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse
- From: Camaleón
- Re: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse
- From: Lisi
- Re: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse
- From: Camaleón
- Re: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse
- From: KS
- [OT] Mice (was: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse)
- From: Camaleón
- PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse
- Prev by Date: Invitatie - Cursuri Perfectionare Gratuite
- Next by Date: Services Monitoring
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Mice
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Mice (was: PS/2 mouse vs USB mouse)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|