Re: 2TB file system
- From: Allan Wind <allan_wind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:31:03 -0400
On 2011-08-17 16:19:27, Dejan Ribič wrote:
BTW: Didn't Hitachi used to be IBM? I am just asking because
I didn't have the best experience with IBM drives, had two of them
and they both broke within 18 months(lucky for me I had quaranty for
them :D ).
Yes. Deathstar ring any bells?
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitachi_Deskstar>
Knock on wood I never had drives go bad on me (Seagate, IBM,
Fujitsu, Maxtor, WD).
Things change very quickly with drives, but perhaps this article
is helpful to ascertain reliability (yes, it says SSD but it has
lots of data on drives as well):
<http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-reliability-failure-rate,2923-3.html>
/Allan
--
Allan Wind
Life Integrity, LLC
<http://lifeintegrity.com>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110817143103.GD2690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2TB file system
- From: lina
- Re: 2TB file system
- References:
- 2TB file system
- From: Rick Pasotto
- Re: 2TB file system
- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: 2TB file system
- From: Roger Leigh
- Re: 2TB file system
- From: lina
- Re: 2TB file system
- From: Dejan Ribič
- 2TB file system
- Prev by Date: Re:[OT] 2TB file system
- Next by Date: Re: 2TB file system
- Previous by thread: Re: 2TB file system
- Next by thread: Re: 2TB file system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
