Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
- From: Celejar <celejar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:45:42 -0400
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:35:41 +1000
yudi v <yudi.tux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see this, at least at startup. It's been reported here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544651
Celejar
That's almost 2 yrs old. From the limited experience I have with this setup,
I don't think this should cause any trouble what so ever.
I might generate a new initrd, after backing up the current one.
Haven't tried this before, cursory glance at the docs suggests this is not
such a difficult task.
FWIW, I've been seeing the problem you describe for years, and I've
been told / seen on the 'net, that it's a known issue, but harmless.
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111018154542.4a2a14cbe9aae1c37f9a5480@xxxxxxxxx
- References:
- LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
- From: yudi v
- Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
- From: Celejar
- Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
- From: yudi v
- LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
- Prev by Date: Re: GNU screen, xterm and mouse
- Next by Date: Re: trying to get the compiz cube
- Previous by thread: Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
- Next by thread: Virtualbox.. hogging resources?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
