Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
- From: Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.productions@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:51:08 +1100
On 29/12/11 19:21, Rick Thomas wrote:
Please don't top-post.
I'm lazy and likely to ignore emails that require effort to read.
Thanks!
Sorry for the delay in answering - for some reason this had been flagged
as spam.
Can you provide some specific model numbers?
No - sorry, not for those specifications. But it's pretty simple to look
up - especially compared to the difficulty of setting up stateful
inspection rules. :-)
I'll need a box that can
do IPv6 tunneling over IPv4, since none of the ISP's I have access to
have native IPv6 or any plans for it in the foreseeable future. Of
course, it will also need to be able to do basic stateful fire-wall
stuff, and the IPv4 side will need to do NAT and port translation.
My preference is to always use Debian - and it's certainly capable of
doing what you want. If you want to buy a device that does that for you
it will probably cost more than $100 as it requires a fair bit of
processing power.
Thanks!
Rick
On Dec 27, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Most of the manufacturers already do (or don't you consider sub-$100AU
cheap?)
<snipped>
Cheers
--
Iceweasel/Firefox extensions for finding answers to Debian questions:-
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/Scott_Ferguson/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4EFD6D6C.6060706@xxxxxxxxx
- References:
- port direction definition
- From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
- Re: port direction definition
- From: Andrei Popescu
- Re: port direction definition
- From: Victor Nitu
- Re: port direction definition
- From: Andrei Popescu
- address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
- From: Rick Thomas
- Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
- From: Andrei Popescu
- Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
- From: Scott Ferguson
- Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
- From: Rick Thomas
- port direction definition
- Prev by Date: Re: Wake on lan, etc
- Next by Date: Re: Iceweasel really slow
- Previous by thread: Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
- Next by thread: Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|