Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Ramon Hofer <ramonhofer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:07:08 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:00:55 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 27 mar 12, 10:45:27, Ramon Hofer wrote:
I was just thinking if it would be better to switch from linux-
image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-686-pae on another machine to linux-
image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-686-pae?
But maybe the difference isn't immense so I probably shouldn't change
the running system :-)
The bpo.1 is likely to disappear from backports very soon and not
receive any security support as of the point bpo.2 was uploaded (the
Kernel Team can't support more than one version in backports).
Thanks for the explanation!
So why didn't they "just" update the version that won't receive any
updates?
Best regards
Ramon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jksahc$8ao$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Andrei POPESCU
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- References:
- Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Ramon Hofer
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Camaleón
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Ramon Hofer
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Camaleón
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Ramon Hofer
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Camaleón
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Ramon Hofer
- Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- From: Andrei POPESCU
- Apt-pinning confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: archive.debian.org/debian down?
- Next by Date: Re: When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?
- Previous by thread: Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Apt-pinning confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
