Re: benchmarking FC1

From: Alexander Dalloz (alexander.dalloz_at_uni-bielefeld.de)
Date: 01/27/04

  • Next message: Jason Dixon: "Re: Configuring NETBIOS/Samba" 
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:48:41 +0100

    Am Di, den 27.01.2004 schrieb Emiliano Brunetti um 15:29:
    > I was asked to get some benchmark results for FC1 on a couple of
    > systems.

    You want to compare different hardware plattforms with FC1 installed or
    a comparison between different Linux distributions, even compared with
    Windows[tm]?

    > This is a new thing to me, as i never used any kind of benchmarking
    > tools for Linux. Also, this is not really specific to FC1, however...

    Just as a fast shot:
    http://freshmeat.net/search/?q=benchmark&section=projects&x=0&y=0

    > I need to benchmark disk I/O, CPU performance, graphic adapter
    > performance an overall performance of both gnome and kde environments.
    > THe best thing would be some kind of tool with also a nice graphic
    > output.

    1) disk performance: hdparm -tT /dev/hdX (with limitations valuable)
       bonnie++ (noisy output)
    2) CPU performance: grep bogomips /proc/cpuinfo (you may know :)
       run kernel compilations with "time make"; run the SPEC
    3) graphics: glxgears
        is 3D performance really relevant? just for gaming IMHO
    4) DM: don't think there are benchmark kits out for testing Gnome/KDE
    performance; choose decent applications and measure time for coming up,
    run several times due to caching effects

    > Any advice?
    >
    > Thanks a lot
    >
    > E.

    Alexander 

    -- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2149.nptl
Sirendipity 15:38:27 up 2 days, 23:16, load average: 1.32, 1.18, 1.11 
                   [ Γνωθι σ'αυτον - gnothi seauton ]
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Jason Dixon: "Re: Configuring NETBIOS/Samba"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [fbsd] Re: (Another) simple benchmark
      ... default worker type for windows. ... While I agree this kind of benchmark is worth doing in order to compare ... performances of the Apache package and the underlying OS. ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: Fastcode CompareMem B&V
      ... > increased in each benchmark run, thus putting no pressure on the branch ... > on the number of bytes to compare. ... A compare should be terminated on matches and mismatches with 50% ... Deadline for 2005 B&V's was passed at 12/12. ...
      (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
    • Re: My own small benchmark
      ... Didn't send it twice, sorry! ... Any benchmark is testing and comparing the systems on its overall ... I wanted to compare them by the efficiency, ... In some computer-magazins there are comparisions by needed ...
      (comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc)
    • My own small benchmark
      ... Any benchmark is testing and comparing the systems on its overall ... I wanted to compare them by the efficiency, ... In some computer-magazins there are comparisions by needed ... power or TDP per GHz or something but tact per time? ...
      (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
    • Re: benchmarking FC1
      ... > I was asked to get some benchmark results for FC1 on a couple of ... Just curious what are you comparing FC1 to? ... Are you comparing hardware boxes where both have FC1? ... To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ...
      (Fedora)