Re: ncftp vs. lftp?
From: Rodolfo J. Paiz (rpaiz_at_simpaticus.com)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Charles Howse: "Re: KMail and PgP"
- In reply to: Dag Wieers: "Re: ncftp vs. lftp?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:41:54 -0600
At 14:06 1/31/2004, Dag Wieers wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 18:38, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >
> > > So, though both ncftp and lftp are probably on par feature-wise and
> > > stability-wise (non-brokenness), the few small advantages of lftp make
> > > me not miss ncftp all that much (GNU readline, GPL, others I'm sure I've
> > > left out). Try it, you just might like it."
>
>lftp has some features that ncftp doesn't.
Sold.
Thanks to everyone for the answers, and particularly to Jason and Dag for
these. I'll start using lftp now.
-- Rodolfo J. Paiz rpaiz@simpaticus.com http://www.simpaticus.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Charles Howse: "Re: KMail and PgP"
- In reply to: Dag Wieers: "Re: ncftp vs. lftp?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]