Security updates are too slow or none existant

From: Nathan G. Grennan (fedora-list_at_cygnusx-1.org)
Date: 02/07/04

  • Next message: Randy Kelsoe: "Re: Socket A KT600 motherboard suggestions"
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 14:46:01 -0800
    
    

      The difference in speed of release of updates, or the release of the
    updates at all seems to have greatly changed with time between Red Hat
    Linux 9 and Fedora Core 1. This seems to be a confirmation of my fears.
    If you compare the Red Hat Linux 9 errata list over the last few months
    to Fedora's updates list you see delays or lack of releases for Fedora
    Core 1 that were made for Red Hat Linux 9. Examples, mailman(only in
    Fedora Core 1 updates testing), slocate(4 days late), mc(no update),
    tcpdump(no update), and httpd(3 weeks late). The emerging policy inside
    Red Hat for Fedora Core is something like be as lazy as you want to be
    about security updates. The net effect seems to be many local exploits,
    and remote exploits attackable for too long. You might question if this
    is just a case of different packages and versions between Red Hat Linux
    9 and Fedora Core 1. I did look at the Red Hat 9 errata closely for
    affected versions, and compared dates. In the above cases Fedora Core 1
    should be in the affected list.

       There are also issues that end up isolated to Fedora Core 1, like the
    current situation with gaim. There are vulnerabilities in gaim(patch
    available, Debian has used it) and there is no sign of a patched rpm for
    Fedora.

      So Red Hat is neglecting Fedora Core 1's security. This is very
    disturbing. It is made worse from my perspective by talk of community
    involvement in packaging, but then almost none exists. The community
    could put a lot of effort into security releases to take some of the
    burden off Red Hat. Then it job would be to confirm it and release it.
    At the very least it would get things into updates testing faster, and
    hence make them more available.

    URL about errata/updates:

    https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh9-errata.html
    http://fedoranews.org/updates/

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Randy Kelsoe: "Re: Socket A KT600 motherboard suggestions"

    Relevant Pages