Re: XFree86 License Change
From: Aaron Matteson (fedora_at_cryptosystem.us)
Date: 02/18/04
- Previous message: Bill Nottingham: "Re: lvm is needed by (installed) mkinitrd-3.5.14-1"
- In reply to: Preston: "Re: XFree86 License Change"
- Next in thread: Robin Laing: "Re: XFree86 License Change"
- Reply: Robin Laing: "Re: XFree86 License Change"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:51:26 -0800
Preston became daring and sent these 0.9K bytes,
> El Martes, 17 de Febrero de 2004 07:32 AM, David Balazic escribi?:
> > Note that the old licence is valid until 4.4.0RC2 , only 4.4.0RC3 has the
> > new licence.
> But, basically the XFree will contnue being Open Source and free, whats the
> difference? I cant underestand the problem yet.
from what i have been able to gather from the couple minutes i have
looked at this, the new license seems to demand permission for any
distribution and subdistribution. There seems to be a few otehr problems
hinting but i need to read the license further. What a pain in the ass.
-- /\o Aaron M Matteson - http://cryptosystem.us /\/ GnuPG key fingerprint is in the header /\ Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, / \ it should be hard to understand! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- /~\ The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML Email! \ / X All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander / \ are lost --jrr tolkien -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Bill Nottingham: "Re: lvm is needed by (installed) mkinitrd-3.5.14-1"
- In reply to: Preston: "Re: XFree86 License Change"
- Next in thread: Robin Laing: "Re: XFree86 License Change"
- Reply: Robin Laing: "Re: XFree86 License Change"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|