Re: Network Functionality Zero
From: Mike Klinke (lsomike_at_futzin.com)
Date: 02/18/04
- Previous message: Eric Krieger: "Re: Recommedations"
- In reply to: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Network Functionality Zero"
- Next in thread: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Network Functionality Zero"
- Reply: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Network Functionality Zero"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:52:11 -0600
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:09, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
> [root@firewall root]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
> # 3Com 3C509B EtherLink III:Unknown
> DEVICE=eth1
> ONBOOT=yes
> BOOTPROTO=none
> ZEROCONF=no
> IPADDR=200.30.141.29
> NETMASK=255.255.255.248
> GATEWAY=200.30.141.25
>
I doubt this will have anything to do with the problem but I'm curious
as to the syntax of your ZEROCONF parameter. I have only seen the
syntax:
NOZEROCONF=yes
to disable the service. Your entry above doesn't look like what I've
seen in the documentation and according to your routing table your
zeroconf is most certainly running, is that what you intended?
Regards, Mike Klinke
Regards, Mike Klinke
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Eric Krieger: "Re: Recommedations"
- In reply to: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Network Functionality Zero"
- Next in thread: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Network Functionality Zero"
- Reply: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Network Functionality Zero"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|