Re: Disk 2 of Fedora Core 1 is FAILED!
From: Adam Voigt (adam_at_kotisprop.com)
Date: 03/03/04
- Previous message: nphilipp_at_redhat.com: "Re: Three Questions from a Linux Virgin"
- In reply to: Gertjan Vinkesteijn: "Re: Disk 2 of Fedora Core 1 is FAILED!"
- Next in thread: Alexandre Strube: "Re: Disk 2 of Fedora Core 1 is FAILED!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:18:12 -0500
Thats not really the case. I'm using it to test out new Linux/Unix
releases, and for my tasks which unfortunately require Windows 2000.
Despite the fact that 2000 is a memory hog, and I only gave VMWare 192
MB of RAM to work with, it runs very well on a 700 MHZ CPU (which is
below average now-adays).
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 19:25, Gertjan Vinkesteijn wrote:
> Why use vmware anyhow, you need a 100Gbyte cpu to handle that program
-- Adam Voigt adam@kotisprop.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: nphilipp_at_redhat.com: "Re: Three Questions from a Linux Virgin"
- In reply to: Gertjan Vinkesteijn: "Re: Disk 2 of Fedora Core 1 is FAILED!"
- Next in thread: Alexandre Strube: "Re: Disk 2 of Fedora Core 1 is FAILED!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
