Re: NTP, ntpdate, and ISP-based firewall
From: jdow (jdow_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 03/04/04
- Previous message: Wayne Steenburg: "Re: "search archives" signature"
- In reply to: Rick Stevens: "Re: NTP, ntpdate, and ISP-based firewall"
- Next in thread: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: NTP, ntpdate, and ISP-based firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:48:57 -0800
From: "Rick Stevens" <rstevens@vitalstream.com>
> jdow wrote:
> > That depends entirely on the rules that are setup, of course.
>
> And if you have iptables log the rejects.
Rick, it is a poor system administrator who does not log firewall
activity. I built "drop_and_log_it" and "reject_and_log_it" type
rules and use them. Of course, I prefer to be mostly invisible from
the outside so I simply drop and log the packets that bounce off my
firewall and disappear into the infinite bit bucket in the sky.
{^_^}
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Wayne Steenburg: "Re: "search archives" signature"
- In reply to: Rick Stevens: "Re: NTP, ntpdate, and ISP-based firewall"
- Next in thread: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: NTP, ntpdate, and ISP-based firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]