Re: RPM packages: Athlon vs i686 vs i386

From: Gertjan Vinkesteijn (fedora.1.90_at_xs4all.nl)
Date: 03/08/04

  • Next message: Ow Mun Heng: "RE: Samba and shared folders" 
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 04:48:40 +0100

    Don Dixon wrote:

    > Hmmm, I can't find a reference to 2.4 in the link. So if it is true
    > that it is referring to 2.4 as well, does that mean there is no
    > difference between the updates kernel-2.4.22-1.2174.nptl.athlon.rpm
    > and a kernel-2.4.22-1.2174.nptl.i686.rpm?
    >
    > Don Dixon
    > fedora-list_me_no_like_spam@macrologic.com
    >
    > Ben Stringer wrote:
    >
    >>On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 14:12, Christopher K. Johnson wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>Not a problem. See http://people.redhat.com/%7Earjanv/2.6/readme.txt
    >>>which includes this note:
    >>>
    >>>"I no longer build athlon kernels because in theory the 2.6 kernel now has a
    >>>mechanism to automatically runtime patch in these optimisations during boot"
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>The OP referred to the 2.4 kernel series.
    >>
    >>Cheers, Ben
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    That's keep trying to be normal (aeb@cwi.nl) 

    -- 
Peace is everywhere
http://gershwin.xs4all.nl
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Ow Mun Heng: "RE: Samba and shared folders"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: RPM packages: Athlon vs i686 vs i386
      ... Hmmm, I can't find a reference to 2.4 in the link. ... that it is referring to 2.4 as well, does that mean there is no ... Ben Stringer wrote: ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Enter Name in contacts appear in the wrong order
      ... I am referring to existing contacts. ... > Russ Valentine ... >> into the Last name field and the Dixon goes into the First Name field. ... >> can I change this so the name is entered into the correct field. ...
      (microsoft.public.outlook.contacts)