Re: Why FC-2?

From: Mark Mielke (mark_at_mark.mielke.cc)
Date: 03/09/04

  • Next message: Alan Horn: "Re: Why FC-2?" 
    To: "Neil Derraugh (UW)" <naderrau@uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:06:45 -0500

    On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 07:15:01PM -0500, Neil Derraugh (UW) wrote:
    > Timothy Murphy wrote:
    > >I'm not entirely clear why it is necessary to have a new distribution.
    > >There doesn't seem anything very revolutionary in it,
    > >so why not just go on upgrading FC-1?
    > I concur. And iterate the idea of upgrading FC-1.

    You concur without expressing your reasons?

    I don't see why we *wouldn't* have major releases, or at *least* minor
    releases. Without releases, we don't have any baselines to work from.

    mark 

    -- 
mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________
.  .  _  ._  . .   .__    .  . ._. .__ .   . . .__  | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/    |_     |\/|  |  |_  |   |/  |_   | 
|  | | | | \ | \   |__ .  |  | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
                       and in the darkness bind them...
                           http://mark.mielke.cc/
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Alan Horn: "Re: Why FC-2?"