Re: Why FC-2?

From: Pedro Fernandes Macedo (webmaster_at_margo.bijoux.nom.br)
Date: 03/09/04

  • Next message: Maynard Kuona: "RE: Password-protecting fedora."
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 06:31:27 -0300
    
    

    Alan Horn wrote:

    >In my experience, a fresh reinstall is generally better than an upgrade.
    >
    >I prefer to :
    >
    > o backup data
    > o wipe out OS
    > o remake filesystems
    > o install new system
    > o apply local config and app management from central mgmt server
    > o restore data
    >
    >
    >
    That's the best way to do , but some people still preffer to simply
    upgrade , even if it can break things... The fresh reinstall also has
    the benefit of making you remmember how you configured everything (which
    helps in case of problems) and why you configured in a certain way
    (making you rethink your decisions. maybe you've learnt something new
    since your last install and now there's a better way to configure the
    same thing).

    >The question then becomes of course; at what point should incremental
    >upgrades be deferred in place of a complete release. That often seems
    >to be a decision best left to the core development team for an OS.
    >
    >
    >
    I believe that FC2 is the perfect example: we're gonna have major
    changes on kernel (changes from 2.4 to 2.6 , SELinux support) , changes
    on perl (including changes on its packaging) , python , removing OSS
    support and adding ALSA support as the default sound system and many
    others I dont remmember now. If we were only going to have a change in a
    specific package , then upgrade would be the best option.

    --
    Pedro Macedo
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Maynard Kuona: "RE: Password-protecting fedora."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: impatient for FC5 release
      ... So is it worth the wait for FC5 release or is FC5t3 ... It is always safest to install from scratch on a bare system with a stable ... to upgrade with the release CDs. ... benefit from more sane defaults choices in config files. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: testing upgrade = dogs breakfast
      ... Exim v3 install to Exim v4. ... it has never failed me except on a hand crafted config. ... nor testing upgrade Exim3 to Exim4. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!
      ... i've about decided the only way to upgrade isn't to upgrade but to have a ... partition for /home and to a clean install every ... ALSA is NOT installed in the usual places as taken ... without any added fiddling with the config) ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: how can I upgrade an old RedHat distro ?
      ... he would lose a lot of config ... so he just want to upgrade. ... wiping the install and putting in a clean install of the new stuff. ... even configuration files will no longer be compatible.) ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Re: Web vs. Desktop based systems
      ... provider with better privacy policy (perhaps Yahoo) also provides ... to other folder or reporting spam or changing the filter recipes. ... But how do you *really* know the important upgrade that keeps ... The alert-window doesn't exactly say *why* you need to install this ...
      (comp.programming)

    Loading