Re: i686 repository
From: Sam Barnett-Cormack (s.barnett-cormack_at_lancaster.ac.uk)
Date: 03/09/04
- Previous message: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Ackward timing for me FC1-FC2?"
- In reply to: nyook: "Re: i686 repository"
- Next in thread: Steve Bergman: "Re: i686 repository"
- Reply: Steve Bergman: "Re: i686 repository"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:27:54 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, nyook wrote:
> Colin Charles wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 00:25, Phil Hannent wrote:
> >
> >>Does anyone know of a repository that has i686 binaries compiled for fedora?
> >
> >
> > They are all i686 optimised.
>
> I see. Does that mean that although the files are labeled i386 they are
> compiled for i386 "under the hood"?
IIRC, they are minimall i686 optimised - that is to say, they will run
on a 386 still, but will run more optimally on a 686. However, they
won't use any extension instructions.
I could be wrong.
-- Sam Barnett-Cormack Software Developer | Student of Physics & Maths UK Mirror Service (http://www.mirror.ac.uk) | Lancaster University -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: Ackward timing for me FC1-FC2?"
- In reply to: nyook: "Re: i686 repository"
- Next in thread: Steve Bergman: "Re: i686 repository"
- Reply: Steve Bergman: "Re: i686 repository"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]