Re: new memory = more swap?
From: Aaron Konstam (akonstam_at_trinity.edu)
Date: 03/19/04
- Previous message: Chadley Wilson: "Re: SMB Shares"
- In reply to: thedogfarted: "Re: new memory = more swap?"
- Next in thread: thedogfarted: "Re: new memory = more swap?"
- Reply: thedogfarted: "Re: new memory = more swap?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:07:39 -0600 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 09:20:56PM +0200, thedogfarted wrote:
> I doubt you need to increase swap unless you already experience a lack
> of swap space. I have 512M RAM and only 256M swap space, but i've never
> had more that 50% of swap space used.
>
> Craig Thomas wrote:
> >I have 256MB ram and a 502MB swap, and want to increase to 384MB ram, [i
> >know, i know it's an old machine]. I've read in the RH manual and else
> >where that double the amount of ram is "right". If I want more swap but
> >don't have any unpartitioned space left, what are my options? (I do,
> >however, have lots of free space on my drive).
> >
> >TIA
> >
> >-Craig
> >
We seem to be in a size war. 512MB of Ram makes a big difference over
256MB of Ram. Again the speed of the processor makes a difference.
Also how much you have installed.
-- ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University One Trinity Place. San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 telephone: (210)-999-7484 email:akonstam@trinity.edu -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Chadley Wilson: "Re: SMB Shares"
- In reply to: thedogfarted: "Re: new memory = more swap?"
- Next in thread: thedogfarted: "Re: new memory = more swap?"
- Reply: thedogfarted: "Re: new memory = more swap?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|