Re: OpenVPN [was: IPSec VPN docs]
From: Brian Chase (networkr0_at_cfl.rr.com)
Date: 03/26/04
- Previous message: Mark Haney: "Re: OpenVPN [was: IPSec VPN docs]"
- In reply to: Florin Andrei: "OpenVPN [was: IPSec VPN docs]"
- Next in thread: Brian Johnson: "Re: OpenVPN [was: IPSec VPN docs]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:49:41 -0500 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Another thing you can try is another hardware IPSec VPN that I use today
and prefer the service, documentation, and support over DLINK
http://www.zyxel.com/product/category.php?indexFlagvalue=1021873683
Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 12:07, Mark Haney wrote:
>
>>I'm trying to get a VPN setup between my FC1 box at home and a DLink
>>DFL300 at my office so I can do some things securely without having to
>>make the 30 minute drive in to work to fix stuff. I've googled the
>>subject and the amount of documentation is pretty immense. Can someone
>>give me a shortened version what I need to configure or point me to a good
>>step by step doc on how to do it?
>
>
> Well, if IPSec is not a specific requirement, and if you actually could
> use any VPN solution that's simple to install, secure and feature-rich,
> have a look at OpenVPN:
>
> http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/
>
> A brief "cookbook recipe" HOWTO:
>
> http://fedoranews.org/contributors/florin_andrei/openvpn/
>
> IPSec VPN (like FreeS/WAN) is nice because it's compatible with all
> kinds of VPN devices and software.
> However, it can be a pain to install, even more so if you're using
> Windows clients (but Linux is not a lot simpler, especially if you have
> non-geek users). Also, it is very, very picky if there are firewalls in
> between, especially if you go through NAT.
>
> OpenVPN is very simple to install, it does not require weird kernel
> patches, it is firewall-friendly, works just fine with Windows (and
> Solaris, and BSD), can tunnel through proxies, etc.
>
> It is not a typical "SSL VPN" - i mean, it is not a browser-based VPN,
> even though it's using SSL to encrypt the tunnel. Think of it as exactly
> the same thing as FreeS/WAN except it's using SSL instead of IPSec;
> otherwise, it can route arbitrary IP protocols, it does not require a
> browser, etc.
> Just like FreeS/WAN, but without the pain.
>
-- Brian Chase Phone: 386-775-5366 2345 Hillside Ave. Fax: 309-276-2048 Orange City, FL 32763 Email: networkr0@cfl.rr.com http://openalternatives.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Mark Haney: "Re: OpenVPN [was: IPSec VPN docs]"
- In reply to: Florin Andrei: "OpenVPN [was: IPSec VPN docs]"
- Next in thread: Brian Johnson: "Re: OpenVPN [was: IPSec VPN docs]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
