Re: XOrg vs XFree86
From: William Hooper (whooperhsd3_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Mark Haney: "Re: OpenSwan RPMs"
- In reply to: T. Ribbrock: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Next in thread: Michal Zeravik: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:47:04 -0500 (EST) To: fedora-list@redhat.com
T. Ribbrock said:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:03:13PM +0000, Paul Thomas wrote:
>> Yes, I'm sure you're right. The crazy thing from my point of view is
>> that
>> the XFree86 1.1 license is virtually identical to the Apache license.
>
> The new or the old one? Apache has been forked as well e.g. by OpenBSD,
Link please. The only thing I see on OpenBSD's web page is that they
Chroot httpd.
> as Apache's licence has been changed for the worse as well.
With respect to GPL compatibility Apache's license hasn't changed. It
never has been GPL compatible.
-- William Hooper -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Mark Haney: "Re: OpenSwan RPMs"
- In reply to: T. Ribbrock: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Next in thread: Michal Zeravik: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]