Re: XOrg vs XFree86
From: Michal Zeravik (michalz_at_olomouc.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Homer Sapions: "Re: Fedora core 1 sendmail problems"
- In reply to: T. Ribbrock: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Next in thread: Mark Haney: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Reply: Mark Haney: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:53:36 +0200 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
What about features difference between Xorg and XFree86?
Are they really full compatible?
With extensions as well?
And xft, nvidia, v4l, freetype ?
michalz
T. Ribbrock wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:03:13PM +0000, Paul Thomas wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, I'm sure you're right. The crazy thing from my point of view is that
>>the XFree86 1.1 license is virtually identical to the Apache license.
>>
>>
>
>The new or the old one? Apache has been forked as well e.g. by OpenBSD,
>as Apache's licence has been changed for the worse as well.
>
>Cheerio,
>
>Thomas
>
>
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Homer Sapions: "Re: Fedora core 1 sendmail problems"
- In reply to: T. Ribbrock: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Next in thread: Mark Haney: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Reply: Mark Haney: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]