Re: XOrg vs XFree86
From: Mark Haney (mark.haney_at_doctordirectory.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Steve Searle: "Re: GPG signatures and list mail"
- In reply to: Michal Zeravik: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Next in thread: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:55:31 -0500
My understanding is that Xorg is a fork of the existing latest XFree86 4.0
libs. Am I right on that?
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:53:36 +0200, Michal Zeravik <michalz@olomouc.com>
wrote:
> What about features difference between Xorg and XFree86?
> Are they really full compatible?
> With extensions as well?
> And xft, nvidia, v4l, freetype ?
>
> michalz
>
>
> T. Ribbrock wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:03:13PM +0000, Paul Thomas wrote:
>>
>>
<snip>
>>
>> The new or the old one? Apache has been forked as well e.g. by OpenBSD,
>> as Apache's licence has been changed for the worse as well.
>>
>> Cheerio,
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>
-- Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me videre? Mark Haney Development, Systems and Network Administration DoctorDirectory.com http://www.doctordirectory.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Steve Searle: "Re: GPG signatures and list mail"
- In reply to: Michal Zeravik: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Next in thread: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: XOrg vs XFree86"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
