Re: kmail lost old folders/emails

From: Alexander Dalloz (alexander.dalloz_at_uni-bielefeld.de)
Date: 04/02/04

  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Drives not mountable with Maxtor SATA/150 (Promise) PCI Card and ATA100/133 drives"
    Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 18:08:33 +0200
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    
    
    

    Am Fr, den 02.04.2004 schrieb John Walsh um 11:57:

    > Hi,

    > Then yesterday I got all the latest packages through up2date:
    >
    > yum fedora-core-1
    > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/1/$ARCH/os/
    > yum updates-released
    > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/1/$ARCH/
    > #yum updates-testing http://fedora.redhat.com/updates/testing/fedora-core-1

    Please use a mirror. The main Redhat server has already enough traffic.

    > I don't think there was a new kmail, but I don't know if it is included as
    > part of another rpm...
    >
    > Anyway, while it was downloading the rpm's (so it had not even installed
    > them yet, but maybe
    > rhn-applet-2.1.4-3.i386.rpm had been installed), I had kmail open and things
    > started to go wrong.

    Doing an XFree and KDE update while having X running is not the best
    idea. Better switch to init 3, run up2date-nox -u there and when
    finished switch back to init 5.

    > First I got error messages when clicking on an existing folder, that it
    > could not read it, because
    > it was either not in 'maildir' format, or it did not have permissions to
    > read it (this is as root).

    root? You mean you are running X and KDE as root? This would be very
    bad. If you did not mean that please explain what the permissions are.

    > So I closed kmail and re-opened it - now it only has the default folders and
    > all the existing ones don't show up.

    If you use IMAP you might need to resubscribe the additional folders.

    > Even in the inbox, new emails show up, but the existing old ones (that are
    > in the correct place) do not show up.
    >
    > All the filters and ID's are still in kmail, just fine, its just the folders
    > and emails that have gone.

    Check the permissions.

    > Another note: that link to the old desktop that was made at the start, also
    > dissapeared.
    >
    > Anyone any ideas ? Or have any questions ?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > John.
    >
    > ps. after the up2date, I don't use the latest kernel because it does not see
    > the mouse, so I'm still running the original FC1.0 kernel 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl

    Which mouse do you have? There should be no issue with the mouse and
    latest FC1 kernel .2174 as far as I know.

    Alexander

    -- 
    Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
    Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl
    Sirendipity 18:03:34 up 14 days, 1:45, load average: 0.12, 0.20, 0.17 
                       [ Γνωθι σ'αυτον - gnothi seauton ]
                 my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
    
    

    
    

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    


  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Drives not mountable with Maxtor SATA/150 (Promise) PCI Card and ATA100/133 drives"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
      ... >> root is denied all access. ... and the kernel checks the permission. ... The userspace can't enforce the permissions. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Question in regards root
      ... now I can no longer login as root, it comes up and says "login: ... I am wondering if there is a command to get around this to become root ... so I can make the changes to the permissions etc? ... This error is returned by the auditonsystem call when your kernel ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
      ... >> Root squashing is actually a much less obnoxious restriction. ... and the kernel checks the permission. ... So why not make default_permissions a feature of the userspace? ... The permissions exposed by the FUSE layer apparently don't correspond ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
      ... This can be disabled by one of two mount ... However you can't restrict root that way, ... you need the userspace daemon to set the permissions on the root ... > But why does the kernel need to know anything about this? ...
      (Linux-Kernel)