Re: A curse on LABEL=
From: ne... (akabi_at_speakeasy.net)
Date: 04/10/04
- Previous message: ne...: "Re: A curse on LABEL="
- In reply to: Timothy Murphy: "Re: A curse on LABEL="
- Next in thread: Jeff Vian: "Re: A curse on LABEL="
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:02:01 -0400 (EDT) To: tim@birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Apr 10, 2004 at 13:10, Timothy Murphy in a soothing rage wrote:
>William Hooper wrote:
>
>>> I understand the supposed advantage of LABEL
>>> if one is changing a hard disk,
>>> but I just feel the confusion it causes vastly outweighs its merits.
>>> Am I alone in this?
>>
>> Try adding a new SCSI controller to a system that moves all existing SCSI
>> devices. You will like LABEL then.
>
>Surely the proportion of users who want to do this is vanishingly small?
To make an assertion like that, you will have to provide
numbers on the amount of FC users who admin servers with
SCSI vs. those who only use IDE stuff.
N.Emile...
-- Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org) Switch to: http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/190653 QOTD: "Don't let your mind wander -- it's too little to be let out alone." 08:59:23 up 20 days, 21:31, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: ne...: "Re: A curse on LABEL="
- In reply to: Timothy Murphy: "Re: A curse on LABEL="
- Next in thread: Jeff Vian: "Re: A curse on LABEL="
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
