RE: Installation of Red Hat

michael.furse_at_Maunbyinvestments.co.uk

Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:08:59 +0100
To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>


-- 
Marius Andreiana
Galuna - Solutii Linux in Romania
http://www.galuna.ro
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:00:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@gwch.net>
Subject: cyradm not working when building from source
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <38266.62.2.21.164.1083063610.squirrel@www.gwch.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
i've had the same effect, regarding too much dependencies.
Use the src.rpms from simon matter, this works fine. They are also easier to update later.
http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/cyrus-imapd/
HTH
Roger
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:03:23 +0100
From: John Hearns <john.hearns@clustervision.com>
Subject: Re: Installation of Red Hat
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083067402.11840.35.camel@vigor12>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 12:44, michael furse wrote:
> We have upgraded our hardware. I am endeavouring to recycle all of our
> old workstations (500 Mhz Celerons with 64mb RAM)  in order to offer
> them to colleagues at no cost. Those remaining (and there should be a
> few) are due to be given to a local state infants school. I wish to
Michael,
  your local Linux User Group will happily give you some help.
I see you are posting from a .co.uk
Where are you in the uk?
Can you tell us the nature of the problem with the install?
Are you trying to boot them from CD?
How many machines do you have to deal with?
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:02:53 -0400
From: jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Use of Software
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083067373.3222.2.camel@jMOD.home>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 02:06, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > I have heard that the use of this software is illegal
> > for commercial use.
> > I don't know how the GPL reads.
> > Anyone have an answer or can point me in the right way to
> > read about it.
> 
> Not sure what you mean. Do you mean can you use GPL'd code in commercial
> software? Do you mean can you include a precompiled version of GPLd
> software with a commercial application or can you use GPL software for
> creating commercial use?
> 
> For the first, yes, but you have to release the source code (IIRC),
> second yes and third, most definately yes.
> 
> For more info, http://www.gnu.org has the GPL as html.
> 
> TTFN
> 
> Paul
If you mean the code ??
If you mean in a commercial environment, usage is unrestricted. 
-- 
jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:10:25 -0400
From: jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: signature.asc files
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083067825.3222.4.camel@jMOD.home>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 07:19, Betti Ann & Preston Smith wrote:
> Now if we could only get users to dispense with those darn signature.asc 
> files.  I get tens of these each day especially from this list
> 
> Preston
> 
> At 08:06 AM 4/27/04, you wrote:
> >I am currently resisting implementing signatures at my company until
> >they come up with one that is not 500 lines long.
> 
> ---
> Betti Ann & Preston Smith, Head of St Margaret's Bay, NS, 
> prsmith@ns.sympatico.ca
The land sharks have even taken over the internet!!
-- 
jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:05:34 -0400
From: "Michael Mayhew" <plainmedici@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: kernel sources...
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <BAY15-F42O2Yyp17FlB00020b04@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>From: Murali P <linuxmurali_48@yahoo.co.in>
>Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: kernel sources...
>Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:56:37 +0100 (BST)
>
>  --- Michael Mayhew <plainmedici@hotmail.com> wrote: >
>Howdy,
> >
> >    I have recently installed Fedora Core 1 and
> > wanted to recompile my kernel
> > but when I went to /usr/src, there is only a redhat
> > directory. I am sure
> > that this question has been asked before (as I have
> > googled and found it),
> > but I am not sure that it has been answered (see
> > first parenthetical). Is
> > there something I need to include when I run
> > installation or am I looking in
> > the wrong directory? Thanks for any and all
> > assistance in this matter.
>Hello  Friend
>You need to have  " Kernel-source-2.x.x " package
>installed to have a directory called as " linux-2.x.x"
>which is the top level dir for kernel source.You can
>run kernel compilation commands from here.Hope this
>would help you.
>Murali
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
Now is that a package option during installation, or do I need an rpm after 
installation.
Michael
_________________________________________________________________
Lose those love handles! MSN Fitness shows you two moves to slim your waist. 
http://fitness.msn.com/articles/feeds/article.aspx?dept=exercise&article=et_pv_030104_lovehandles
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:12:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: hicham <hichamlinux@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Alcatel ADSL USB Modem (Singapore)
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20040427121240.89205.qmail@web21322.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
look at this site 
http://speedtouchconf.sourceforge.net/
get the latest version of speedtouchconf.tar.gz
run the shell script 
Hicham
 --- Ong Chee Kiong <mic_key80@yahoo.com.sg> a écrit :
> Hi,
> I am a newbie from Singapore, recently, i've install
> fedora Redhat core1 on my comp. My kernel version is
> 2.4.22.
>  
> I was trying to set up my internet connecttion using
> the Alcatel ADSL USB Modem. I have check up the
> redhat websites for all the relevant postings and
> have tried all the methods that i can find. However,
> i still can't get my connection up.
>  
> My ISP is Singnet and it requires me to dial in a
> specific number in order to connect. e.g "17351".
> I've never come across any article which mention
> anything concerning the need to dial in a number for
> ADSL modems. Can anyone help me out on this? Thanks
> alot!!!
>  
> mickey
> 
>  Yahoo! Messenger
> - Log on with your mobile phone!> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>  
	
	
Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout ! 
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/
Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis grâce à Yahoo! Messenger !Téléchargez Yahoo! Messenger sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:19:23 -0400
From: jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: 1 of 2 CDROM freezes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083068363.3222.10.camel@jMOD.home>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 07:41, Amar Kumar Padhi wrote:
> Hi,
> I have got two CDROM drives on my PC  (99 make, P2, 512MB, dualboot- 
> win2k/fedora core1). CDROM1 (read/write) gets recognized but CDROM (read 
> only) just hangs on being accessed.
> 
> ATAPI CD-ROM DRIVE 40X MAXIMUM (hangs!)
> Samsung CD-R/RW SW-224B.       (ok!)
> 
> One gets recognized as SCSI drive (samsung, about 2 years old) and is 
> operational.The other drive gets recignized as IDE (ATAPI, about 5 years 
> old). Anything I try simply does not work. The system just hangs and I need 
> to restart. Even saying "eject cdrom" hangs the system.
> 
> When I boot with GNOME, it just hangs in the startup screen (on the CDROM 
> icon). KDE allowed me to get in and check out the drives from the shell. I 
> am lost as to what needs to be done next. Any help would be great guys! 
> Thanks!
> 
> from dmesg:
> hdb: ATAPI CD-ROM DRIVE 40X MAXIMUM, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> blk: queuec040cfc0, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0Xffffffff)
> hdb: Disabling (U)DMA for ATAPI CD-ROM DRIVE.
> 
> from /etc/fstab:
> /dev/cdrom     /mnt/cdrom      udf,iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro 0 0
> /dev/cdrom1    /mnt/cdrom1     udf,iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro 0 0
> 
> 
> from /etc/sysconfig/hwconf:
> class: CDROM
> bus: IDE
> detached: 0
> device: hdb
> driver: ignore
> desc: "ATAPI CD-ROM DRIVE 40X MAXIMUM"
> -
> class: CDROM
> bus: SCSI
> detached: 0
> device: scd0
> driver: ignore
> desc: "Samsung CD-R/RW SW-224B"
> host: 0
> id: 0
> channel: 0
> lun: 0
> generic: sg0
> 
> Thanks!
> amar
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Easiest Money Transfer to India. Send Money To 6000 Indian Towns. 
> http://go.msnserver.com/IN/42198.asp Easiest Way To Send Money Home!
Any drive will "hang the system" if it has I/O errors. To check try
mounting from the command line < mount /mnt/cdrom > and if there are I/O
errors they will be output to the terminal.
The CD R/W being seen as scsi indicates a 2.4.x kernel and is needed for
burning.
-- 
jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:25:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: "duncan brown" <duncanbrown@linuxadvocate.net>
Subject: Re: mozilla xmms gaim
To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
	<64703.192.58.199.185.1083068751.squirrel@atom.csionline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
funny you mentioned it.  i had the same problem with xmms and ogg123 about
5 minutes ago.  have you tried changing the output driver on xmms?
does anyone know of a fully working alsa driver for xmms?
-d
Aaron Hughes said:
> Has anyone ever had problems with mozilla and gaim freezing while xmms
> is paused or playing.  This happens to me about once every couple days
> and if I stop xmms they continue working immediately and then I can also
>  continue playing xmms.  I have only noticed this with while using
> fedora  core 1.
>
> chunk
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-+(duncan brown
-+(duncanbrown@linuxadvocate.net
-+(http://www.linuxadvocate.net
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\                        - against microsoft attachments
Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy
evidence of the fact.
                -- George Eliot
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:28:46 +0200
From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@uni-bielefeld.de>
Subject: Re: New hardwareraid is not found
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083068926.5458.16.camel@sirendipity.dogma.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am Di, den 27.04.2004 schrieb GÃ¶tz Reinicke um 10:02:
> Hi,
> 
> I recently attached a new SATA2SCSI Hardwareraid to my Dell Poweredge 
> 1650 running Fedora Core Linux. The Raid is a Starline easyraid X8P with 
> 8 * 160 GB SATA as a raid 5.
> 
> The server is running fine so far and its SCSI-Bios has found the raid.
> 
> But Linux isn't showing the RAID :-( I can't fdisk /dev/sdb and there is 
> no entry of showing the disk in the logs or dmesg.
> 
> Any Ideas, did I miss something....?
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> GÃ¶tz Reinicke
Can you describe the "SATA2SCSI" hardware RAID a bit more? Is it a
controller card to which you can plug SATA IDE drives and the controller
appears as SCSI to the system? So the controller card certainly needs
driver support. Didn't you ask Starline before buying that hardware
whether it is Linux prepared? What does Starline say is the correct SCSI
kernel driver module for the card?
Alexander
-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
Sirendipity 14:25:32 up 13:14, 11 users, 0.20, 0.19, 0.10 
                   [ Î“Î½Ï‰Î¸Î¹ Ïƒ'Î±Ï…Ï„Î¿Î½ - gnothi seauton ]
             my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040427/378da4d1/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:29:19 +0200
From: Marian POPESCU <softexpert@libertysurf.fr>
Subject: Re: Best .doc opener
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <c6ljnh$b0n$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Adam Cooper wrote:
> Sorry if this has already come up.
> 
> Which is the best MS .doc file "parser" i.e. which give the most true
> display as seen in MS office.
> 
> Openoffice doesn't seem to cope with a large doc I've got. I'm going to
> install Abi and give that a go.
> 
> Any others?
> 
> Thanks for any help
> Adam
> 
> 
It depends on what you want to do ...
If it's just recovering maximum of text, you could use the following:
antiword : http://www.winfield.demon.nl/
a2ps     : http://www.infres.enst.fr/~demaille/a2ps/
wvHtml   : http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
wvText   : http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
Good luck,
Marian
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:33:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: "duncan brown" <duncanbrown@linuxadvocate.net>
Subject: Re: Installation of Red Hat
To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
	<46784.192.58.199.185.1083069229.squirrel@atom.csionline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Fuzzy,
you definitely need to get more ram for these machines, 64 is usable, but
they're going to be nearly unusable.  i recommend putting an additional
128mb module into these machines to bring them up to 192 (or more) or
they're going to be constantly going into the swap file and making the
machine nearly useless (and drastically shortening the lifespan of your
hard drives)  you should be able to pick them up for 10 to 15 pounds at a
second-hand computer store (estimated given the exchange rate from us to
uk, the dollar shall rise again! =])
chances are that these machines can only handle 128mb sticks, so avoid
anything larger unless you KNOW it'll work.
-d
michael furse said:
> We have upgraded our hardware. I am endeavouring to recycle all of our
> old workstations (500 Mhz Celerons with 64mb RAM)  in order to offer
> them to colleagues at no cost. Those remaining (and there should be a
> few) are due to be given to a local state infants school. I wish to
> install Linux and other open-source software on these machines, and
> ideally to remove the existing W98 installation and accompanying files.
> I have downloaded Linux 9 from Fedora but my attempts to get it running
> have so far been a spectacular failure. Any constructive advice,
> preferably based on previous experience, would be much appreciated.
>
> Fuzzy
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-+(duncan brown
-+(duncanbrown@linuxadvocate.net
-+(http://www.linuxadvocate.net
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\                        - against microsoft attachments
Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy
evidence of the fact.
                -- George Eliot
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:37:56 +0200
From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@uni-bielefeld.de>
Subject: Re: signature.asc files
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083069476.5458.25.camel@sirendipity.dogma.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am Di, den 27.04.2004 schrieb Betti Ann & Preston Smith um 13:19:
> Now if we could only get users to dispense with those darn signature.asc 
> files.  I get tens of these each day especially from this list
> 
> Preston
Hi,
if your mail client does not follow/support standards, then you
certainly should think about exchanging it. Or contact the support of
the programming company.
For serious, your mail header shows up
X-Mailer:  QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6
as MUA, and I can't say how good or bad that client is in supporting
standards. End of March I did initialize a thread with subject "GPG
signatures and list mail" with quite some responses. the conclusion -
not only by me - was, that it's a client side problem, if it does not
handle signed mails proper. Typically those "problems" arise on
Windows[tm] platforms.
GPG/PGP signed messages are a feature and no bug ;)
Alexander
-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
Sirendipity 14:29:33 up 13:18, 11 users, 0.11, 0.16, 0.10 
                   [ Î“Î½Ï‰Î¸Î¹ Ïƒ'Î±Ï…Ï„Î¿Î½ - gnothi seauton ]
             my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040427/fad05504/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:47:07 +0200
From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@uni-bielefeld.de>
Subject: Re: Installation of Red Hat
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083070027.5458.33.camel@sirendipity.dogma.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am Di, den 27.04.2004 schrieb michael furse um 13:44:
> I have downloaded Linux 9 from Fedora but my attempts to get it running
> have so far been a spectacular failure. Any constructive advice,
> preferably based on previous experience, would be much appreciated. 
> 
> Fuzzy
Michael,
I don't want to be more regal than the pope, but there is no "Linux 9",
else you are from the future. Then welcome back ;)
Linux is at 2.4.26 and 2.6.5 (see http://www.kernel.org/). Linux is the
kernel, the rest are mainly GNU tools and distribution work.
If with "Linux 9" you spoke about Redhat 9, then this is not Fedora. See
the top of the Fedora project site at http://fedora.redhat.com/ where it
clearly states that Fedora is no Redhat Inc supported product.
So it is not that clear to me what you did download: Redhat 9 - which
reaches EOL in 3 days - or Fedora Core 1. With Redhat (9) questions you
would be on the wrong list, while Fedora Core topics are highly
discussed here.
Regards
Alexander
-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
Sirendipity 14:40:10 up 13:29, 11 users, 0.02, 0.12, 0.10 
                   [ Î“Î½Ï‰Î¸Î¹ Ïƒ'Î±Ï…Ï„Î¿Î½ - gnothi seauton ]
             my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040427/0b416355/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:50:52 -0400
From: jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Installation of Red Hat
To: duncanbrown@linuxadvocate.net,	For users of Fedora Core releases
	<fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1083070252.3222.12.camel@jMOD.home>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 08:33, duncan brown wrote:
> Fuzzy,
> you definitely need to get more ram for these machines, 64 is usable, but
> they're going to be nearly unusable.  i recommend putting an additional
> 128mb module into these machines to bring them up to 192 (or more) or
> they're going to be constantly going into the swap file and making the
> machine nearly useless (and drastically shortening the lifespan of your
> hard drives)  you should be able to pick them up for 10 to 15 pounds at a
> second-hand computer store (estimated given the exchange rate from us to
> uk, the dollar shall rise again! =])
> 
> chances are that these machines can only handle 128mb sticks, so avoid
> anything larger unless you KNOW it'll work.
> 
> -d
> 
> michael furse said:
> > We have upgraded our hardware. I am endeavouring to recycle all of our
> > old workstations (500 Mhz Celerons with 64mb RAM)  in order to offer
> > them to colleagues at no cost. Those remaining (and there should be a
> > few) are due to be given to a local state infants school. I wish to
> > install Linux and other open-source software on these machines, and
> > ideally to remove the existing W98 installation and accompanying files.
> > I have downloaded Linux 9 from Fedora but my attempts to get it running
> > have so far been a spectacular failure. Any constructive advice,
> > preferably based on previous experience, would be much appreciated.
> >
> > Fuzzy
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> 
> -+(duncan brown
> -+(duncanbrown@linuxadvocate.net
> -+(http://www.linuxadvocate.net
> 
> ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> /\                        - against microsoft attachments
> 
> Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy
> evidence of the fact.
>                 -- George Eliot
He said he had extras -- scavenge --
 -- 
jludwig <wralphie@comcast.net>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:50:14 -0400
From: "Adam T. Gautier" <adam_gautier@yahoo.com>
Subject: Building a home directory
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <408E5706.4000602@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I have implemented an LDAP server for system logins.  To create a new 
user I create an LDIF file and load it into the LDAP server and then 
create the home directory.  My question is how do get the home directory 
to be created with the default settings for a home directory (bash 
settings and what not).  Thx.
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:55:44 +0100
From: WipeOut <wipe_out@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Best .doc opener
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <408E5850.3040205@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Marian POPESCU wrote:
>It depends on what you want to do ...
>If it's just recovering maximum of text, you could use the following:
>
>antiword : http://www.winfield.demon.nl/
>a2ps     : http://www.infres.enst.fr/~demaille/a2ps/
>wvHtml   : http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
>wvText   : http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
>
>Good luck,
>Marian
>
>
>  
>
Are there any command line utilities like these for OpenOffice .sxw files?
Later..
------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 2, Issue 289
*******************************************
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

RE: Installation of Red Hat

Relevant Pages