RE: signature.asc files
From: Rui Miguel Seabra (rms_at_1407.org)
Date: 04/27/04
- Previous message: duncan brown: "Re: converting user to linux"
- In reply to: Douglas Furlong: "RE: signature.asc files"
- Next in thread: Christopher Ness: "RE: signature.asc files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:07:49 +0100
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 15:59 +0100, Douglas Furlong wrote:
> > > RFC's are guidelines, not standards. I have not seeing any software out
> > > there that adheres 100% to the RFC's, there are always relaxed
> > > interpretations.
> >
> > HTTP 1.1 is a standard. Right? Wrong?
> > Right! The standard is RFC 2616 IIRC.
> > ^^^
> >
> Just a tiny point, just because some thing has an RFC, and is a
> standard, does not mean it's a standard due to the existence of the RFC.
I agree, but just because it is an RFC it doens't mean it's not a
standard :) (which is what I was refuting!)
Rui
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: duncan brown: "Re: converting user to linux"
- In reply to: Douglas Furlong: "RE: signature.asc files"
- Next in thread: Christopher Ness: "RE: signature.asc files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
