Re: RH9 to Core 1

From: Ted Gervais (ve1drg_at_av.eastlink.ca)
Date: 04/30/04

  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Tar/Zip/Rar trouble" 
    Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:31:10 -0300
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    You are right Steve. Sorry for being so vague.

    I will have to compile a list to be more exact, but since I just put it on
    last night my first impressions were that some of my 'stuff' didn't work
    right off. For example, one of my IRC applications didn't come up
    anymore. I haven't investigated why, but I am sure it can be resolved.
    There is no sound when KDE comes up but maybe that is because there is not
    meant to be any in this release??
    I do have sound though, as I played some music (on a CD) and that worked
    fine. I did read however, that others had problems with their sound. Also
    it scattered my icons all over the desktop which was unusual but that can
    be fixed. And I guess I can go on. But all in all, while Fedora installed
    just fine, it didn't hit me the right way. Maybe Core 3 will look
    prettier? I don't know but we do have to move on.

    So, all in alll I guess I really don't have a complaint. Other than my
    first impressions, I guess I can get over that. But RH9 was really pretty
    and nice, plus it did everything I wanted.. Too bad WE had to move..

    At 12:20 PM 4/30/2004 +0100, you wrote:
    >Around 12:08pm on Friday, April 30, 2004 (UK time), Ted Gervais scrawled:
    >
    > >
    > > I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
    > >
    > > RH9 had everything one would want, or at least I was happy with it. But
    > > because of the support for it disappearing on April 30th I decided to move
    > > to Fedora as others have.
    >
    >Perhaps you could be a little more specific than "Why it is not as nice
    >as RH9?". As it stands, your question is no easier to answer than "Why
    >isn't Ted Gervais as nice as those who voluntarily contribute to Fedora,
    >or those who appreciate what a fantastic OS they get for free?".
    >
    >Cheers
    >
    >Steve
    >
    >--
    >
    >(o< www.stevesearle.com
    >//\ Powered by Fedora Core
    >V_/_ No MS products were used in the creation of this message
    >
    > 12:16pm up 54 days, 20:40, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.15, 0.20
    >
    >--
    >fedora-list mailing list
    >fedora-list@redhat.com
    >To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list 

    ---
Ted Gervais,
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia, Canada
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Tar/Zip/Rar trouble"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: No sound after kernel compiled
      ... > 2.6.5 but mostly for usb peripherals sicne i purposely didnt compile them). ... > I then tried running mplayer and got no sound. ... > the same sound problem occured with my old kernel too. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: New Kernel lose sound
      ... > It seems everytime I compile a new kernel I lose sound. ... > Everything went smoothly, but as to be expected, several kernel settings ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: voice activated recorder?
      ... >>compile and when I asked how to fix the errors other users said the program ... >>when there's sound on the input. ... Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server ...
      (comp.os.linux.development.apps)
    • Re: building the kernel
      ... > So iam guessing I didnt include some hardware support I needed. ... > sound configuration in the kernel. ... You may find it easier to start with the config file from the ... Then before going any further in the compile run ...
      (comp.os.linux)
    • Re: automatic synchronization for multi cam editing?
      ... at least have ambient sound from the music on all the tapes? ... to sync the tracks together using the music on the sound track. ... Do-able, but not exact. ... Good for finding a rough sync. ...
      (rec.video.production)